@article{APM7744,
author = {Stephanie Cheon and Arnav Agarwal and Marko Popovic and Milica Milakovic and Michael Lam and Wayne Fu and Julia DiGiovanni and Henry Lam and Breanne Lechner and Natalie Pulenzas and Ronald Chow and Edward Chow},
title = {The accuracy of clinicians’ predictions of survival in advanced cancer: a review},
journal = {Annals of Palliative Medicine},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
year = {2015},
keywords = {},
abstract = {The process of formulating an accurate survival prediction is often difficult but important, as it influences the decisions of clinicians, patients, and their families. The current article aims to review the accuracy of clinicians’ predictions of survival (CPS) in advanced cancer patients. A literature search of Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE was conducted to identify studies that reported clinicians’ prediction of survival in advanced cancer patients. Studies were included if the subjects consisted of advanced cancer patients and the data reported on the ability of clinicians to predict survival, with both estimated and observed survival data present. Studies reporting on the ability of biological and molecular markers to predict survival were excluded. Fifteen studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified. Clinicians in five studies underestimated patients’ survival (estimated to observed survival ratio between 0.5 and 0.92). In contrast, 12 studies reported clinicians’ overestimation of survival (ratio between 1.06 and 6). CPS in advanced cancer patients is often inaccurate and overestimated. Given these findings, clinicians should be aware of their tendency to be overoptimistic. Further investigation of predictive patient and clinician characteristics is warranted to improve clinicians’ ability to predict survival.},
issn = {2224-5839}, url = {https://apm.amegroups.org/article/view/7744}
}