Ultrasound evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter in relation to propofol and inhalational anesthetics in patients having surgery in the Trendelenburg position
Letter to the Editor

Ultrasound evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter in relation to propofol and inhalational anesthetics in patients having surgery in the Trendelenburg position

Mario Graziano1, Ilenia Di Paola1^, Giuseppe Marotta2

1Department of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy; 2Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria 'San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona', Salerno, Italy

^ORCID: 0000-0003-1444-6663.

Correspondence to: Ilenia Di Paola. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende – 84081 – Baronissi, Salerno, Italy. Email: ileniadipaola1@gmail.com.

Comment on: Yang J, Yang X, Li X, et al. Effects of propofol and inhalational anesthetics on the optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10:10475-85.


Submitted Jan 15, 2023. Accepted for publication Jan 29, 2023. Published online Feb 14, 2023.

doi: 10.21037/apm-22-1301


We read with great interest the review and metanalysis by Yang et al. concerning the effects of propofol and inhalational anesthetics on the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in patients undergoing surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position (1).

We laud our colleagues for the brilliant paper, but we would like to offer them some observation.

In this article the colleagues have observed that the ONSD was lower during propofol anesthesia than during inhalational anesthesia after adopting the Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum, suggesting that propofol anesthesia may help to minimize intracranial pressure (ICP) changes compared with inhalational anesthetics.

As the authors did not report the ventilation technique utilized in the studies that they analyzed, we were wondering if the difference of increase in ONSD could have a relation to the ventilation technique and not only to the type of anesthesia.

Karaca found the ONSD after anesthesia’s induction was significantly lower in the pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) mode than in the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode (2).

The explanation for such differences could be the choice to utilizing B scan technique to measure the ONSD.

We are conscious that evaluation of the ONSD by US B scan has been applied as a non-invasive technique to identify an increased ICP, but unfortunately a considerable number of artefacts could make that evaluation not strictly accurate (3,4). Unluckily, even considering the suggestion to image the central retinal artery with color Doppler (5) these complications cannot be surmounted.

To avoid these complications, in future studies, we suggest a more accurate investigation could have been achieved with the so-called standardized A scan technique (6-8).


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was a standard submission to the journal. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://apm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/apm-22-1301/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Yang J, Yang X, Li X, et al. Effects of propofol and inhalational anesthetics on the optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10:10475-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Karaca U, Onur T, Okmen K, et al. Effect of Various Modes of Mechanical Ventilation in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Cognitive Functions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021;31:808-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N. Ultrasound optic nerve sheath diameter evaluation in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery. J Robot Surg 2019;13:709-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N. Optic Nerve Evaluation in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:E36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Copetti R, Cattarossi L. Optic nerve ultrasound: artifacts and real images. Intensive Care Med 2009;35:1488-9; author reply 1490-1. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Cornetta P, et al. Ocular ultrasound evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter in military environments. Mil Med Res 2019;6:16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N. Optic nerve ultrasonography for evaluating increased intracranial pressure in severe preeclampsia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2019;38:147. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Rosa D, Graziano M, De Paola I. Evaluation of Intracranial Pressure During Neural Laser Discectomy. Pain Physician 2022;25:E414. [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Graziano M, Di Paola I, Marotta G. Ultrasound evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter in relation to propofol and inhalational anesthetics in patients having surgery in the Trendelenburg position. Ann Palliat Med 2023;12(3):618-619. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-1301

Download Citation