Discussion on the interpretation of the results and selection of the effect model in a meta-analysis
Letter to the Editor

Discussion on the interpretation of the results and selection of the effect model in a meta-analysis

Jing Tu1, Qingqing Fang2, Anli Zhao1, Jiangfeng Wu1^

1Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China; 2Department of Ultrasound, Tianxiang East hospital, Yiwu, China

^ORCID: 0000-0002-5036-799X.

Correspondence to: Jiangfeng Wu. Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang 322100, China. Email: wjfhospital@163.com.

Response to: Qu Y, Sun H, Chen J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: gray-scale ultrasound and shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of primipara pregnancy and delivery. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10:11664-77.



Submitted Dec 19, 2021. Accepted for publication Feb 16, 2022.

doi: 10.21037/apm-21-3819


We read with great interest the recent published study by Qu and colleagues entitled “Systematic review and meta-analysis: gray-scale ultrasound and shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of primipara pregnancy and delivery” (1). They explored the value of gray-scale ultrasonography combined with shear wave elastography (SWE) in the assessment of primipara pregnancy and delivery. However, after a careful learning of the literature, we would like to pay attention to some important missing aspects in the study.

Firstly, in the results section of the abstract, the authors revealed that age (Figure 4), body mass index (BMI) (Figure 6), gestational age (Figure 5), gestational age at delivery (Figure 7), neonatal weight (Figure 8), and cervical depth (Figure 9) were significantly different from those of the control group. However, we believe the results are false because of the P values >0.05 showed in referred figures above and there are no statistical differences.

Secondly, in Figure 13, the meta-analysis on the comparison of shear wave velocity of posterior lip was performed by using a random effect model. However, the enrolled articles were considered to be homogeneous because of P=0.53 and I2=0%. Therefore, we believe that the fixed effect model should be adopted actually (2).

In short, Qu et al. (1) revealed a significant issue with regard to the value of gray-scale ultrasonography combined with SWE in the assessment of primipara pregnancy and delivery, however, the conclusions of the present study should be interpreted with caution because of the concerns above.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was a standard submission to the journal. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://apm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/apm-21-3819/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Qu Y, Sun H, Chen J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: gray-scale ultrasound and shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of primipara pregnancy and delivery. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10:11664-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Wu J, Ge L, Wang X, et al. Role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the diagnosis of an abscess in paediatric skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Ultrason 2021; Epub ahead of print. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Tu J, Fang Q, Zhao A, Wu J. Discussion on the interpretation of the results and selection of the effect model in a meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med 2022;11(3):1153-1154. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-3819

Download Citation